i agree Russia does not want to destroy Ukraine. otherwise they would have bombed Ukrainian infrastructure similar to how USA was targeting Iraqi infrastructure.
but it is also evident that Russia does not have air supremacy they do have air superiority but not supremacy. Which is why the Turkish drones are taking out Russian armor. It also seems the Ukrainians are targeting fuel carriers and the Russians are having issues with fuel for their tanks and armored vehicles and are leaving some of their tanks abandoned due to no fuel.
Smart. Yet I somehow still see them getting dragged into it.
imho this is due to nato provocation. imagine if mexico flirted with the warsaw pact. straight up provocation.Turks in Europe are pro-Ukraine/The West
Arabs in Europe are mostly neutral or lowkey pro-Russia.
So people are just low IQ.
Probably ganna be used as a meat shield!They'll probably arrest him trying to get in for being black
They'll probably arrest him trying to get in for being black
“We’re only in the opening days of this, and Putin has a lot of cards to play,’’ said Douglas Lute, a former U.S. lieutenant general and ambassador to NATO. “It’s too early to be triumphalist, and there are a lot of Russian capabilities not employed yet.”
Russia has seemed markedly restrained in its use of force and even clumsy in the early days, said Mathieu Boulègue, an expert in Russian warfare at Chatham House. “They were paying the price of their own rhetoric, that this was a defensive war against fascists and neo-Nazis,’’ he said. But now “we have an irritated Kremlin, and we haven’t seen yet what Russia has in store.”
In their effort to take Kyiv quickly, based on “terribly flawed assumptions about Ukraine,” the Russians withheld much of their combat power and capabilities and “got a bloody nose in the early days of the war,” said Michael Kofman, director of Russia studies at CNA, a defense research institute.