Salafi Community Continues To Grow In The UK

TekNiKo

Loyal To The One True Caliph (Hafidahullah)
Dr Yasir Qadhi a PhD and graduate of Medina University explains how the evil modern Salafi group emerged with the advent of Muhammad ibn AbdulWahab


The Evil Wahabbi Salafis even takfiired the parents of our Prophet SAW (wal ciyaadubillah)!!

 
I wonder why they think that is.

You'll find the same thing happening with anti-Ummah and Arab bashing threads; they join forces with apostates and liberal fasiq Muslims (at best, munafiqeen at worst - I'm talking about people who openly and unabashedly reject established Islamic rulings and always promote liberal views and values instead) to encourage division in the Ummah and hate on other Muslims (e.g., Arabs). They don't stop to wonder what possible agenda these groups have and how they're helping them against themselves. This is what happens when you lead with emotions/whims instead of overriding it with following the deen.

It is because they view the world the same way and hold the same values as them whether they know it or not. It is not Islam that they value.

It is good because it exposes them to the average reader. There is a clear agenda against Islam and one would be foolish to think there is not a huge effort to influence/misguide on places like this.

You do not know who you are speaking to, people should keep that in mind.
 

Abaq

VIP
It's complicated and multifaceted all you need to know is that the biggest source for salafis are sheikh ibn Taymiyyah, sheikh Uthaymeen, sheikh ibn baz, sheikh Al-Albani and Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab.
That's actually false. For example, Sharhus Sunnah by Imam al Muzani which is a core book was written by Imam al Muzani, one of the closest students of Imam al Shafi'i
 
Dr Yasir Qadhi a PhD and graduate of Medina University explains how the evil modern Salafi group emerged with the advent of Muhammad ibn AbdulWahab


The Evil Wahabbi Salafis even takfiired the parents of our Prophet SAW (wal ciyaadubillah)!!

There’s a valid ikhtilaf (difference of opinion) on whether the Prophet’s ﷺ parents are in Hellfire or paradise. Imam Suyuti (if I remember correctly) argues that they were saved whereas Imam Nawawi (if I remember correctly) argues that they died on paganism and they will be in Hellfire.

Arguing that Salafis are deviants for sticking to a valid position is just ignorant.

I’m not a Salafi but I laugh at many of the Anti-Salafi arguments that stems from pure ignorance.

“MIAW was an agent of the British”

“They don’t celebrate Mawlid or approve of our Istighatha so they must be deviants”

If you’re going to argue against them, at least do it academically.
 

tyrannicalmanager

pseudo-intellectual
This is a lengthy topic and cannot be summed up in a post. The main reason is that its based on takfir. Wahhabism was a movement against the Ottoman empire, they made takfir on millions of muslims which made their blood halal to spill. They also made takfir on many scholars of the past. They have an extreme interetation of the Quran and reject anything else. In the past, Islam accepted differences. Example being the different schools of thought we have which were all respected. But majaority of salafis reject differences, it can only be their way.

This is why mainstream sunni scholars including Egypt Al-Azhar views salafism as a deviant sect and not part of mainstream sunnism.
Al-Azhar are the dogs of Sisi.
 

al-Mu'tamid المعتمد

عِشْ مَا شِئْتَ فَإِنَّكَ مَيِّتٌ
There’s a valid ikhtilaf (difference of opinion) on whether the Prophet’s ﷺ parents are in Hellfire or paradise. Imam Suyuti (if I remember correctly) argues that they were saved whereas Imam Nawawi (if I remember correctly) argues that they died on paganism and they will be in Hellfire.

Arguing that Salafis are deviants for sticking to a valid position is just ignorant.

I’m not a Salafi but I laugh at many of the Anti-Salafi arguments that stems from pure ignorance.

“MIAW was an agent of the British”

“They don’t celebrate Mawlid or approve of our Istighatha so they must be deviants”

If you’re going to argue against them, at least do it academically.
Which they don't tend to do.
 

tyrannicalmanager

pseudo-intellectual
al-Azhar used to mean something else back in the day. But today it's diff.
"Salafis not sunnis"
this was said at a conference held in occupied Chechnya.
 

al-Mu'tamid المعتمد

عِشْ مَا شِئْتَ فَإِنَّكَ مَيِّتٌ
"Salafis not sunnis"
this was said at a conference held in occupied Chechnya.
That the same guy that said there is nothing wrong with Shi'is, and that you can safely convert to their heresy.

:heh:
 

Trending

Latest posts

Top