Lmao, Sharia has NEVER been changed and will NEVER be changed. That's only possible if the Qur'an and Sunnah 'changes', we both know that will never happen.
Sharia is not a monolith. That's why its interpretation changes from country to country. Sharia doesn't need to be changed when it already has changed and will continue to change ...
They did not base their ijtihaad on the Qur'an and Sunnah but rather their ijtihaad is literally based on innovations. Shi'ism is believed to have been invented by a Jewish man called Abdullah ibn Saba to cause confusion amongst the Muslims.Are you guys forgetting the existence of the Shia and Ibadi or do you not consider them Muslims?
It is supposed to happen bro, you are right about that. We inevitably commit sins too, does that mean we should not try and avoid them? Come on sxb.All of what you see was meant to happen anyway, "Nikaah bayn al- mar'i wal-mar, wal-raajal bil-rajal", "Marriage between women and women, and men and men". It's Qadr, it's all part of Allah's plan, I just feel bad for the Muslims who are caught up in the array of emotions of countless same-sex stories, their faces on Yawm Al-Qiyamah..
It is supposed to happen bro, you are right about that. We inevitably commit sins too, does that mean we should not try and avoid them? Come on sxb.
They did not base their ijtihaad on the Qur'an and Sunnah but rather their ijtihaad is literally based on innovations. Shi'ism is believed to have been invented by a Jewish man called Abdullah ibn Saba to cause confusion amongst the Muslims.
This is proof. Their supposed narrations regarding the 'sunnah' are literally fabrications, save some of the ahadith they implement that can be found in kutub Al-Sittah. I know you can't understand what I'm telling you or what the debate in this video is about but oh well.You're sick.
This is proof. Their supposed narrations regarding the 'sunnah' are literally fabrications, save some of the ahadith they implement that can be found in kutub Al-Sittah. I know you can't understand what I'm telling you or what the debate in this video is about but oh well.
The scholars have authored many books dedicated to this issue, it was even confirmed by some of their most 'knowledgeable' ulama subhanallah.
No one said civil marriages are Islamic marriages lmfao. Civil marriages are valid from the perspective of the non-Muslim residents in a secular state. Why should a 'Shaykh' support a cause that does not explicitly concern the Muslims in the first place? The implicit effects are apparent for any Muslim capable of critical thinking (knowledge is required for critical thinking, ones judgement of an issue should be based on the Qur'an and Sunnah).Kkkkkk
Why is everyone injecting religion into this. Civil marriages are not Islamic marriages. This is what you're denying people. A piece of paper.
On that account we should also be on the side of denying same sex couples hotel rooms etc......
Astagfurullah Shias are muslim. People here speak with such authority on subjects, it's another thing when you speak on islam though.
Wallahi Iyo Billahi there is proof in that video and the proof is the defectiveness of their methodology of ilm Al Rijaal. We know the authentic hadiths due to the science of ilm Al-Rijaal. Besides, scholars agree on the authenticity and weakness of MOST of the hadiths besides a few because some Scholars might notice a weakness in a narrator whilst others do not.I watched the video and it didn't prove anything. It could be argued that not all hadiths Sunnis deem to be Sahih are actually authentic. Didn't Sh Al-Albani class some hadiths from Sahih al-Bukhari as da'eef? If that is the benchmark you're using to deem Shia non-Muslims, your argument is very weak.
Are you truly a Muslim? Sharia is the word of God, it cannot be changed.
Sharia is not a monolith. That's why its interpretation changes from country to country. Sharia doesn't need to be changed when it already has changed and will continue to change ...
Wallahi Iyo Billahi there is proof in that video and the proof is the defectiveness of their methodology of ilm Al Rijaal. We know the authentic hadiths due to the science of ilm Al-Rijaal. Besides, scholars agree on the authenticity and weakness of MOST of the hadiths besides a few because some Scholars might notice a weakness in a narrator whilst others do not.
You're ignorance knows no bounds.
That's according to Albani. Every scholar makes mistakes, scholars have made this reality very clear. The prominent scholars of Hadith (Muhaditheen) disagree on only a few of the ahadiths. This is due to the fact that one scholar might have information about a specific narrator that the other scholar did not come across.So explain why there are weak and fabricated hadiths in Sahih al-Bukhari according to Sh Al-Albani?
I'm a Suuni, a follower of the prophet and his sunnah. Shias shouldn't be compared to Suunis.So explain why there are weak and fabricated hadiths in Sahih al-Bukhari according to Sh Al-Albani?
@SOMACOON Sharia is not only based on the Quran, but also on hadiths so how can it be the word of God? Shia's and Ibadi's have their own hadiths, thus they have their own Sharia. There isn't one form of Sharia and there a several different interpretation of the Sunni Sharia so what did I say that would make me a non-Muslim?