The Seemingly Never-Ending Debate

Which Side is Worse?


  • Total voters
    47

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
Saudi Arabia isn't one. It's literally an absolute monarchy. And the only reason it even exists is because Ibn Saud made an agreement with the British for 9000 pounds to annex the Najd since they wanted to split up the Ummah.
If Saudi ain’t a muslims muslil country, then what make a muslim country?
Are you making takfir?
 
So? It’s in the authority off the Muslims.. And its recorded in an authentic hadith that Mekkah will remain a muslim country. So who do we listen to you or this hadith?
Makkah isn't a country though, it's a city. And Saudi Arabia is a distinct entity smdh.
 
Saudi Arabia itself is a modern creation, a successor state to the puppet state of the British. Allah doesn't recognize it one bit. It is a Muslim-majority country but to say it is Islamic or Muslim itself is just plain false. You misunderstood. The hadith wasn't referring to Saudi Arabia, you misinterpreted it - it meant Arabia. Saudi didn't exist back then so how could it mean that? It didn't. I'm right and so is the hadith. It isn't a matter of belief, both are correct.
 

Lum

رَّبِّ زِدْنِي عِلْمًا
Saudi Arabia itself is a modern creation, a successor state to the puppet state of the British. Allah doesn't recognize it one bit. It is a Muslim-majority country but to say it is Islamic or Muslim itself is just plain false. You misunderstood. The hadith wasn't referring to Saudi Arabia, you misinterpreted it - it meant Arabia. Saudi didn't exist back then so how could it mean that? It didn't. I'm right and so is the hadith. It isn't a matter of belief, both are correct.
Seems like you misunderstood the hadith
 
Top