The Somalis and the Camel: a Historic Economic Development Toward Islamic Period

It is very peculiar and curious how Ethiopianists are quick to claim things that historically and under discussion they associate you with as a reductive mechanism of historical revisionism, in the sense of, seeing how pastoral networks were the fundamental skeletons of the economic flow for the entire region, they suddenly have to internalize that feature because of its relational consequence, weakening their claim on the grip of the civilization.

That Harari guy was, on the one hand, calling Somalis pastoralists incapable of building formal time-enduring structures (clearly coping by evading the archeology of the Somali and Somali region of Ethiopia), saying the domain was herding camels. On the other, when it came to the presence of camel, not only as the early phase of the Islamic mark in the region attributed to practice, inhabitation, and also main logistic economic flow, the Harari suddenly claimed that the interior Habash highlander, non-camel keeping populations incorporated camel caravans as their disposition. When evidence highlights the economic emphasis of camel specialization was crucial for the explanations of the flow of goods and commodities throughout the Islamic civilization of the Horn of Africa, he was quick to claim that as well. Thus the man said, (paraphrasing) "camels were not only a Somali-based thing" - to which I responded it was quintessentially Somali, with Afars also herding camels (only assuming: however, I do believe this given the desertic geography), but keeping to northern areas, a region not relevant to the regional parameters of the discussion we had.

The next argument would be Oromo camel pastoralists. Well, this is a failed association. Oromos that herd camels are Somaloid that were incorporated on the whole sub-clan level into Borana upon the incursion of the latter into northern Kenya, a region they historically did not settle, only pushed roughly simultaneously with the northward Oromo expansion. The other Oromo in the Western peripheral lowlands of Ethiopia incorporated camel herding into their subsistence from Somali contact.

Such distribution is represented in the region of the Horn of Africa today:
1724532988028.png


The Borana are either Somaloids or Boran that moved into drylands already inhabited by Somaloids, assimilated the Somaloids, and borrowed similar subsistence for adaptation in the region in the 16th century and onwards.

We have ethnographic evidence in the anthropological research to show this:

"Many groups of lowland camel pastoralists, who spoke Somali-like dialects or had spoken such dialects before they adopted the Boran variety of Oromo, brought them regular presents to their ritual centres in what now is Ethiopia, from an economic perspective a very light burden, and received a blessing from the qallu, the ritual head of one or the other of the two moieties to which the Boran and all of their allies were associated. Also the age-grading (gada) systems of some groups took chronological clues from each other and involved ritual exchange (Schlee 1998a). The pre-colonial picture of social relations is made up of both difference (Somali/Somaloid/Oromo speakers, cattle/ camel husbandry, distinction along interethnic hierarchy) and interaction (co-residence in the same or adjacent areas, sharing of water points, economic exchange, ritual interdependence). It was a system organized along differences without separation. This inter-ethnic system, the Boran-centred alliance known as Worr Libin (People of Libin), also had a military aspect. The Boran, jointly with their camel-keeping allies, repelled the Laikipiak Maasai who had ventured far into northern Kenya." "Territorializing ethnicity: the imposition of a model of statehood on pastoralists in northern Kenya and southern Ethiopia" (2011), p. 859-860.

"I found important cultural elements of the modern pastoral groups to go back to a Proto-Rendille-Somali (PRS) complex. Apart from the Rendille, Sakuye and others, I included the Gabra and Garri, discussed by Fekadu (2009), in this perspective. My conclusions were that those among the ancestral populations, who were bearers of this PRS culture, were not Somali, but speakers of Somali-like (Somaloid) languages like Rendille. For being Somali, they lacked the core feature of being Muslims. Before their split into the modern ethnic groups, they may have borrowed elements of Arabo-Islamic culture, but the bulk of their camel-oriented beliefs and rituals had nothing to do with Islam. Neither were they Oromo; many of them adopted the Oromo language only in recent centuries." Schlee, Gunther, "Territorializing ethnicity: the imposition of a model of statehood on pastoralists in northern Kenya and southern Ethiopia." p 869

The word for camel exists deep in all the Somaloid languages:
1724531457743.png

Heine, Bernie, 1978, "The Sam languages: The History of Rendille, Boni and Somali", p. 45,

We're talking 2000 years at least, existing in all the Somaloid languages.

We have evidence of an ancient presence of the dromedary in Somaliland:
1724531503735.png


1724531533955.png

One site that shows camel was dated between 1600-2100:

1724532792502.png

Brandt, A. Steven (1987), "Pastoral Rock Art in the Horn of Africa: Making Sense of Udder Chaos", p. 200.

The camel takes over as the drying of the land in the north increases, reflected in the faunal depiction in the art itself:
1724532745091.png


1724532760628.png

(Same source): p. 207, and 208

You see, the source emphasized the correct assessment that long-distance trade was easier facilitated with the dromedary introduction. A drier Somali north was, in a strange way, the beginner of a more complex economic function through subsistence adaptation with the help of a new mobile beast of burden, where previous to that, subsistence was perhaps not relied on for wide economic networking stretching toward the hinterland of modern Ethiopia, only wide-range transhumance instead, with cattle/ovicaprid-keeping pastoralists that moved long stretches for herding purposes, first and foremost. As one sees the earlier phase of rock art shows a uniform presence in the northern Somali region and Eastern interior Ethiopia, evincing the presence of ethnic homogeneity but only for agro-pastoralism. The latter is of a Nubian art style and tradition according to my assessment (with evidence coroborated by researchers), in harmony with the migration from the Egypto-Sudanic region. But that is another topic.

Here are depictions from the previous site dating between 1600-2100 in Somaliland:
1724532693520.png



This not only places early Somalis in the north, but it also adds that the camel was in existence during those days, shown in the core subsistence vocabulary genetic in all the Somaloid languages, including ancient engravings on rocks.

Not only that; there exists firm physical archeological proof that further substantiates camel presence in the northern coast. We have Ceel Gerdi producing the earliest camel remains so far out of the excavations in Somaliland, with this current site CG-02 dated to the 1st century CE.
1724532627963.png


"A camel metatarsal was also documented in CG-02, the oldest occurrence of this species so far in Somaliland. A fragment of a rib from a size 4 herbivore could also have belonged to a camel." González-Ruibal et al. (2022)., "Nomads Trading with Empires: Intercultural Trade in Ancient Somaliland in the First to Seventh Centuries CE."

You see, the argument that the camel was not very much centered with Somalis goes against the evidence -- it's archetypical Somali-based. This is nothing short of comprehensive coverage of evidence from independent areas of disciplines that all corroborate that the camel was from the north, Somalis were the ones handling them, Somalis have their origin in the north, and that such subsistence, geographic adaptation, and presence also was dealt by Somalis in a territorial sense that later bore economic significance by the pre-Islamic early trade, at least since the beginning of the first millennia, all the way continually into the Islamic era. Rock art even shows that Somalis had a presence with the camel in the Galbeed with similar rock art and fauna remaining. The latter dated to 1600 years ago. On top of that, before the camel, livestock herders of a similar style had expanse from the northern Somali region all the way into the Galbeed, always showing undeniable continuity of presence of essentially where Adal and the entire lowland region of the horn of Africa since we got there.

This is something even the people studying the rock art agree with:

"An interesting element of the paintings from this site consists of engravings tracing the outlines of some figures. One of the bovine paintings has its horns and udder engraved (Fig. 7D) in a similar fashion to what is reported from sites further east in Somaliland and Somalia e Las Geel (Gutherz et al., 2003) and Karin Heegan (Brandt and Carder, 1987). Further investigations of such stylistic similarities may reveal some degree of cultural and economic connection across a vast area of the horn of Africa stretching from the highlands of Western Harerghe to the plains of Somaliland." - Assefa, Zelalem, (2013), "Survey and explorations of caves in southeastern Ethiopia: Middle Stone Age and Later Stone Age archaeology and Holocene rock art."

Here is the art style that is the same as the one from Laas Geel:
1724532829569.png



However, it is important to emphasize that the dating of the Laas Geel rock shelter seems to have been considerably older.
 
The camel came with another style the Dahthani that was much more recent, and also coincides with the period of camel introduction around 2000 years before the present:

"In the most recent phase of Dahthani style proper the bovines are replaced with camel and schematic or abstract patterns of the recent past (Cervicek and Braukamper, 1975). Many of these patterns consist of a variety of geometric and tribal symbols (Clark, 1954). This later stage of Dahthami style proper is highly distributed across Horn of Africa including many sites in Somalia (Clark, 1954, Jönsson, 1983). A late Holocene date (c. 2000 BP) age has been suggested for the Dahthami style proper (Cervicek, 1979, Brandt and Carder, 1987)."

These dates go well with the information laid out before on the came fossils found in the 1st century in the north, the information that shows all the Somaloid languages have root camel word items which means we would go back to around 2000 years before they all split into dialects and languages.

In the latest phase, you had the camel presence very markedly in the rock art. Here is an example of a rock shelter in God-Hardhane, 10 kilometers northwest of El-Afweyne:
1724533078071.png

Ali, Y. M & Ibrahim, I (2012), "Rock Art in Somaliland: Discovery of two new rock painting sites."

@Idilinaa this thread was related to the one you refreced my posts but it was a lot so I figured it deserved its own thread.
 
Does that mean the camel was only introduced 2 thosuand years ago? But didn't the domestication happen either in somalia or southern arabia. If it was domestic in south arabia 1000 b.c then why did it take so long to arrive in somalia
 
Does that mean the camel was only introduced 2 thosuand years ago? But didn't the domestication happen either in somalia or southern arabia. If it was domestic in south arabia 1000 b.c then why did it take so long to arrive in somalia
The camel did not exist in wild form in the Somali peninsula, only in Arabia do we have archaic wild form and there do we have the oldest ones, not only in depictions but also in archeologic remains plus all the camel populations in Africa go back to the Arabian one. It is safe to say we did get it from the Arabians. It could have come a couple of centuries earlier in the late 1 millennium BC, but not by much, in my opinion. None of the early rock art shows any camel in any place in Africa, let alone the Horn of Africa, before the domestication in Arabia.

In the matter of why it did take so long? Because we did not need it until the northern region became drier. The camel is an arid-based animal, not one to stay in too green areas because then it would be more economical to keep cattle. The camel is a very resource-intensive animal but very resource-efficient in regions where food is scarce, plus it can eat much of anything in the wild shrub-filled desert. That is why you see in the rock art itself, it goes from cattle and sheep and goats to later with camel sheep and goats. So it was that the inhabitants of the region needed a better adaptable animal since the cattle could not survive. Secondly, Somalis as in E-V32 people had only stayed in the region for several centuries prior, on top of that the South Arabian T folks literally came about 2200-2000 as a coherent paternal and maternal unit that came from a population that had historical continuity shown in the mutation rates.

Basically, we got it because of the drying of the north and the cattle weren't economical anymore and they would die out. You can see several types of cattle species that we simply don't have in the region anymore in the rock art. The depiction also shows a greener environment with more faunal diversity. Somaliland has been in a long-term drying period going back 2000 years and more, with possible fluctuations within.
 
Last edited:
This study answers all your questions. Camels were introduced to Northeast Africa from Arabia. They have used DNA testing.

It's important to emphasize that the study claims that the Somali camel is a bit more distinct and has more diversity than the others but this is because I think Somalis have kept close knit pedigree since more than 2000 years ago, not mixing the initial camels they received from Arabia with newer ones, compared to North African camels that I think mixed more with Arabian camels of different periods for various adaptability purposes. This speaks to the idea that Somalis received camels quite into and above the 2000-year range but also had their distinct camel tradition in terms of the internal mixture of practices that were not continually subject to Arabian camel influence; although that was the origin of the initial influence. This is also evident in the genetic homogeneity of the Somali camel. The early diversity does not contradict the other dimension.

We can see the result in this from the characteristics of adaptations of the Somali camel which was noticed to be very desert adaptable with the best endurance of all other camels.
1724536665373.png
1724536673091.png
1724536678635.png
 
Last edited:

Thegoodshepherd

Galkacyo iyo Calula dhexdood
VIP
Does that mean the camel was only introduced 2 thosuand years ago? But didn't the domestication happen either in somalia or southern arabia. If it was domestic in south arabia 1000 b.c then why did it take so long to arrive in somalia
Camels were domesticated in southern Arabia. They were however introduced to the Horn very shortly after that. It is why Somali camel culture is so similar to the culture of early southern Arabia. An introduction date ranging from 200 BC- 200 AD seems plausible to me.

I also suspect that T-L208 introduced the camel to the Horn.
 
The camel did not exist in wild form in the Somali peninsula, only in Arabia do we have archaic wild form and there do we have the oldest ones, not only in depictions but also in archeologic remains plus all the camel populations in Africa go back to the Arabian one. It is safe to say we did get it from the Arabians. It could have come a couple of centuries earlier in the late 1 millennium BC, but not by much, in my opinion. None of the early rock art shows any camel in any place in Africa, let alone the Horn of Africa, before the domestication in Arabia.

In the matter of why it did take so long? Because we did not need it until the northern region became drier. The camel is an arid-based animal, not one to stay in too green areas because then it would be more economical to keep cattle. The camel is a very resource-intensive animal but very resource-efficient in regions where food is scarce, plus it can eat much of anything in the wild shrub-filled desert. That is why you see in the rock art itself, it goes from cattle and sheep and goats to later with camel sheep and goats. So it was that the inhabitants of the region needed a better adaptable animal since the cattle could not survive. Secondly, Somalis as in E-V32 people had only stayed in the region for several centuries prior, on top of that the South Arabian T folks literally came about 2200-2000 as a coherent paternal and maternal unit that came from a population that had historical continuity shown in the mutation rates.

Basically, we got it because of the drying of the north and the cattle weren't economical anymore and they would die out. You can see several types of cattle species that we simply don't have in the region anymore in the rock art. The depiction also shows a greener environment with more faunal diversity. Somaliland has been in a long-term drying period going back 2000 years and more, with possible fluctuations within.
So where does punt and the incense trade fall into this. Since we know that some people were trading incense as far back as 1500 b.c
 

Thegoodshepherd

Galkacyo iyo Calula dhexdood
VIP
@The alchemist a lot of people who are settled assume that nomadism is necessarily non-cosmopolitan. Somali nomads knew what a ship was, they knew what a book was, they knew what a compass was, they knew about steelmaking, caulking, making a sail, they knew how to grow sorghum, a significant share of them could write their language with Arabic script, they knew how to fish, how to farm date palms, etc...

These people hear camel nomad and think they were like Eskimos, totally cutoff from civilization.
 
What harari guy? I don't think anyone was arguing that in that other thread. Made a simple conversation about economic developments into Ethiopian/Harari civilizational beef with Somalis , when we are neighbors and cousin groups.

Oromos aka Borana largely adopted the camels from Somalis during the late 1500s and 1600s, this is documented by Bahrey in his book ''The History of Gallas'', who was an eyewitness to their migrations that turned into invasions. They also adopted horses and mules from us as well and among other things like weapons technology.

Mentioned this briefly before: I was planning on making a thread but i wont have time to stick around much the next few days since summer break is over.
I could make a thread another time about the full description and extent of the the initial migration and the full scale invasions and the developments it had for Oromo.

They would aquire mules, horses, cattle from Somalis and from people they plundered in 1554-62, this is when they started the effective attack and to ride horses and mules. Bahrey stated that before then they used to kill people and all animals including horses and mules, except for goats and cows. In the period 1578-86 they learned about shields and iron spears and so on.

And lay off forcing this Somaloid stuff. People are not ''Somaloid'' because they share similarities with us or related to us, they have credit to their own separate identities, there is no Somali monopoly or hegemony.

Somalis didn't have a monopoly on camels as you have shown with other lowlanders like Afar who was familiar with camels alongside us in Antiquity, but it was our inhabited geography plains , platues, river crossings and wide dispersal as well that facilitated that transportation and effective trade not just the camel alone.


The camel was introduced to Somalia in pre-historic times more than 5000 years ago and the camel domestication time difference in Arabia and Somalia was relatively insignificant.

In Somalia, most of the known camels were painted in historic times. Only two single camels in two different sites can be considered as dating to pre-historic times for they are found with hump-less cattle.

A live-size camel was observed among different herds of well-shaped cattle in the Karin-Heegan rock art site to the west of Boosaaso
xODa3Eg.png


In the Xuunshaale site, about 300 km to the SW of Karin-Heegan, a determined artist managed to carve at least one camel on a standing wall of a huge basalt in a less accessible area of fallen basalts. It appears that it was engraved at the time of incising the hump-less cattle on the rock of the floor

ARhIsLq.png



This part you have shown does not speak to the dating of the camel rock art at all, it's speak of dating charcoal samples from the middle levels of occupation of the rock shelter.
One site that shows camel was dated between 1600-2100:

View attachment 340231
Brandt, A. Steven (1987), "Pastoral Rock Art in the Horn of Africa: Making Sense of Udder Chaos", p. 200.


Because of it's pre-historic presence in Somalia and the linguistic studies: There are certain scholars that have argued a seperate domestication of the camel in Somalia/Horn of Africa via translocated wild camels from Arabia in pre-arabic times.

NcWgG6L.png



However the camel did indeed become more widely adopted during the 1st millenium BCE, this is shown in the rock art when the camel started to replace the cattle for importance.

A Summary of our current knowledge of camel in Somalia:

Social and Economic Developments in Pre-Islamic Somalia: Introducing African-Arabian-Mediterranean Interaction

The camel: Nearly half of the camels around the world are owned by the Somalis [41]. Despite their apparent antiquity, the date of raising camels in Somalia is yet to be known. It has been postulated that the camel was introduced to Somalia from Arabia. In recent investigations on a vast area of Northwest Arabia, pictures of live-size camels are assigned up to 5000 years ago [42]. However, growing evidence suggest that the camel domestication time difference in Arabia and Somalia was relatively insignificant. In both regions, camels were engraved on many rock art sites in a wide area. In Somalia, most of the known camels were painted in historic times.
Only two single camels in two different sites can be considered as dating to pre-historic times for they are found with hump-less cattle. A live-size camel was observed among different herds of well-shaped cattle in the Karin-Heegan rock art site to the west of Boosaaso [43]. In the Xuunshaale site, about 300 km to the SW of Karin-Heegan, a determined artist managed to carve at least one camel on a standing wall of a huge basalt in a less accessible area of fallen basalts. It appears that it was engraved at the time of incising the hump-less cattle on the rock of the floor (Figure 5).
What appears here is that the Proto-EC were familiar with the camel but it was widely adopted during the early first millennium BCE. The rock art also suggests that it was that time when camels replaced cattle for importance. After all, some of our economic lexemes should have been exchanged through ancient trade networks.
 
Last edited:
Camels were domesticated in southern Arabia. They were however introduced to the Horn very shortly after that. It is why Somali camel culture is so similar to the culture of early southern Arabia. An introduction date ranging from 200 BC- 200 AD seems plausible to me.

I also suspect that T-L208 introduced the camel to the Horn.
Those Arabians had to come with a tribe. Maybe moving to flee a tribal warfare. T-L208 in Somalis coincides with mtDNAs that have the same TMCRA from Arabia. It makes me think that the initial folks were not some random man but maybe a dynasty moving and intermixing by giving away daughters with the local Somalis, while the T guys were taking Somali women. Merging of a small coherent elite group rather than random males and random females from Arabia.

I say this because those Somaloid guys have similar Arabian mtDNA that I think goes back to 2200-2000 as well - them being founder effects of the broader Somali population early on.

HV1 is definitely one that came with T:
1724537307172.png


Notice this one had a Somali back migrating to Yemen 1000 years ago. That is an evidence of Islamic migration into Arabia by a Somali female during the time of the Islamic period:
1724537385658.png


It goes further, it seems like one mtDNA variant came from Arabia 2800 years ago, which is shared by a proto-Somali descended El-Molo which connects them to Somalis. Only that they split into small tribes, had rapid cultural divergence, did not re-mix with Somalis, and rather mixed with distinct groups not having Somali-like affinities but looking like Nilotes, mainly speaking Samburu. But those people were once early Somalis indistinguishable from us before they diverged away. You also have HV1 and I in Rendille that also involves this. I think R0 (@Juke went into this if I don't remember correctly).
 
@The alchemist a lot of people who are settled assume that nomadism is necessarily non-cosmopolitan. Somali nomads knew what a ship was, they knew what a book was, they knew what a compass was, they knew about steelmaking, caulking, making a sail, they knew how to grow sorghum, a significant share of them could write their language with Arabic script, they knew how to fish, how to farm date palms, etc...

These people hear camel nomad and think they were like Eskimos, totally cutoff from civilization.

Let 's be clear Somalis were historically split into 4 camps.

Sedentary agro-pastoralists who combined livestock rearing with arable farming:

Town dwellers who engaged in trading/or occupations.

Nomadic herders who grazed pastures across the land and small groups of fishermen by the coast.

Small groups of fishermen along the coast:

Nomads directly facilitated civilization building and regional trade system: Echo what i said before in another thread:
Nomads much like sedentary urban, agricultural Somalis were important in the regional system and the sultanate.

They acted as transporters, producers, intermediaries/brokers, distributors, security, resource exploitation and connectors.

Nomads groups also served as carriers of information. Through their interactions with various communities, they disseminated news, knowledge, and market trends.

Historically there would be no significant urban society, much less trade in the region without them.

Qh3a5jn.png

JOWFvCo.png
 
Last edited:
What harari guy? No one was arguing what you are claiming. Made a simple conversation about economic developments into Ethiopian/Harari civilizational beef with Somalis , when we are neighbors and cousin groups.
I have no beef, only referring to the @oogabooga guy who was arguing what I stated, until all the comments were deleted in the J haplogroup Mahreean thread. You were not in that discussion so I would like you not to assume, who did not argue what because I did not say you claimed such or that it took place in the thread you posted in (this was a seperate matter from the other day but was relevant). Ask @Step a side for reference. Other than that, I have no beef with no Hararis (never put them down on this thread or when he was outward calling us primitive and lying as my comments put forth), they are frankly irrelevant as a group in this discussion, only Ethiopianists I was referring to, which that guy was by default argument (doesn't matter where the person is from), saying all the things I systematically broke down on this thread. I used his arguments to demolish them once and for all because he was not the first Ethiopianist who said those things. He was merely the symbol that I used as an example, lol. But let's not make it into a personal matter or petty ethnic beef because this is not about Hararis but Somalis.

Besides that, the camel situation. No. There is no evidence we domesticated it. The word geel itself was a loanword from a Southern Arabian loanword according to linguists.
1724540882751.png


The presence in the linguistic depths in Somalis goes to when the Somaloids coalesce in the proto-Sam (as my source stated and underscored by what you posted) - this is only a couple of centuries prior to 0 CE (we're not talking archaic here). Arabians had it earlier, got the wild version, got a depiction of it in their rock art earlier, etc. The genetics of all the camels are related. Separate domestication would mean a wild version of them roaming around in the Somali peninsula showing divergent genetic regionalism from the rest of the world. I think it is best to be rational about this. The earliest evidence of the fossil record in burial sites in the north coincides with this showing the 1st century, the rock art was the latest also attesting to a 2100-1600 time-line. This is fairly rigorous and comprehensive.

And lay off forcing this Somaloid stuff. People are not ''Somaloid'' because they share similarities with us or related to us, they have credit to their own separate identities, there is no Somali monopoly or hegemony.
You're taking this personally. Somaloids is merely the non-Somali people that did indeed diverge from the continual Somali people at different points. I have established this on genetic grounds. They identities today are divergent and they are not Somalis by ethnicity Somaloids are basically a macro statement of related people that belong to a fairly tight linguistic, genetic and deep-culture phylum. This is a wide-picture assessment, nothing recent, like saying Cushitc. These terms have meaning in their context. I will not conform to your ideas because I never called Rendille Somali, I don't believe that at all, lol. Keep it professional, sxb and stop the accusations. This is the second time. It's devolving the thread into a tasteless direction. This is not a cringe "all those people are Somali" discussion or Hararis suck. That is beneath me. Just laying it out for you. This is strictly anthropological.

With the Afar claim, I literally said they co-used camels, but that they were not relevant in the geography of Somalis... This was about the Somali region, and this was an answer to the claim of @oogabooga who literally claimed Somalis did not deal with the camel caravans... This is not some bum strawman but the actual response to claims made. Ask @Step a side if you think I am simply just breaking down arguments of shadows, lol.

. In Somalia, most of the known camels were painted in historic times. Only two single camels in two different sites can be considered as dating to pre-historic times for they are found with hump-less cattle.
Nope. The source I showed a site that was dated 1600-2100 before the present. We can pin these to that and we see an increase in the later phases that the camel is taking growing emphasis during the 2000-ish years ago time line.

Anyway, I don't want to spend my thread debating you about your impositions, misunderstandings and accusations. I think it is in bad taste because I spent time compiling what is based on evidence on several sources.
 
So where does punt and the incense trade fall into this. Since we know that some people were trading incense as far back as 1500 b.c
Incesce was traded on the northern coast in those days. Punt was a separate matter, sxb. It was much older and centered more in Eritrea.

Thought we had the donkey before the camel. Remember the oceanic systems were used for trade. Berenike for example was the spot Blemmyes traded with us.
 
@The alchemist a lot of people who are settled assume that nomadism is necessarily non-cosmopolitan. Somali nomads knew what a ship was, they knew what a book was, they knew what a compass was, they knew about steelmaking, caulking, making a sail, they knew how to grow sorghum, a significant share of them could write their language with Arabic script, they knew how to fish, how to farm date palms, etc...

These people hear camel nomad and think they were like Eskimos, totally cutoff from civilization.
Somalis had a complex arrangement of several macroeconomic participatory factors that made up the whole. There was no hard boundary between farmers, pastoralists and traders -- all were complimentary and synergistically part of each others dynamics and Somalis interplayed in several aspects. Historically this has continuity with the unique A-Group Culture Nubians and later. Somalis were historically agro-pastoralists-traders. They needed that to cover adaptable ground. Read the ancient Nubians to get an insight of what I am talking about. We are descendants of those people. It is the reason why Blemmyes mirrored us on their end as well.
 
Last edited:
This part you have shown does not speak to the dating of the camel rock art at all, it's speak of dating charcoal samples from the middle levels of occupation of the rock shelter.
That is what we go off from in the Laas Geel as well, from what I gathered. From such indirect samples. By the way, the change in the rock art has been analyzed and the camel ones are always consistently younger during when the artyle changed. All of those art style analysts noted that, as I understood it.

But at least with the Laas Geel and related variations artstyle horizon is consistent with the C-Groups type art that is dated into more ancient period. I also think the pottery in one of the sites in the western Galbeed was of the older Nubian sort.
1724543116293.png

1724543121229.png


I've said the same thing before by analyzing the cattle shapes themselves. Even posted it here before.
 
Last edited:

NidarNidar

♚Sargon of Adal♚
VIP
Camels were domesticated in southern Arabia. They were however introduced to the Horn very shortly after that. It is why Somali camel culture is so similar to the culture of early southern Arabia. An introduction date ranging from 200 BC- 200 AD seems plausible to me.

I also suspect that T-L208 introduced the camel to the Horn.
This correlates with the Sabean inscriptions found in Sanaag, dating back around 2,300 years. While this might be a coincidence, it's notable that the J1 haplogroup, which has been associated with the T haplogroup, is still present in the region. Do you think it's possible that the early Somali people with the T haplogroup spoke a South Arabian language? This could potentially explain the 20% Arabic influence in the Maxaa Tiri lexicon and the significant Arabian cultural/genetic impact observed among Northern Somalis.

This was merely something long-time brewing my friend. We've had bits and pieces here and there and you have cats like @Shimbiris to give credit to as well. Since it was just a long-form conversation over the years.
I really appreciate this post of yours and Shimbiris, I've learnt so much in the last year.
Salute Aye Aye Captain GIF
 
But doesn't the perplus of the eraythran sea show that there were somalis or proto somalis all the way down south in the first centruy a.d . Doesn't that mean the split happen several centuries or even a millenia before ?
 
Top