Abortion is murder. You made a snarky remark about eugenics and doubled down, to deflect away from it you’ve now bought up a point that I’ve not even made (mental illness and marriage). You’ve attacked me twice, and I’ve only attacked your position, you claim to be smart I know that I am not.You have comprehension issues. Besides that, under what law is an insane individual allowed to get married? Do you know what is called " Consent"? Can the mentally ill consent to marriage and in what country do they allow the insane to bear responsibility? You keep repeating eugenics to sound informed but it is obvious you have no clue about the basics of who among human beings are deemed capable to give consent.
Did you even know that Islam doesn't allow the concealment of an illness that would have an impact on the marriage much less insanity before you get married? Full disclosure is required or you can't get married - it is considered Haraam to do that. Hold on to the kids the insane would produce saxib.
I don't care to explain the rest.
I moved the argument to abortion and away from affirmative action as a barometer for your political beliefs; you are either a cookie cutter partisan or you just like to be right. Clarence Thomas is as much a “coon” as your favourite rapper, both want the best for their people (“pull yourself up by your bootstraps”/“put on my hood”) although the execution is questionable. My opinion on the affirmative action ruling is nuanced: I don’t deny the existence of prejudices, I don’t deny the existence of historic injustices and I see the positives of it and the caveat of being seen as lesser by your peers (this being reconcilable through acknowledgment of your selfish nature: “I’m out for me”). That being said you cannot get me to dislike the honourable judge, his conservative/libertarian views serve as a much need counter-balance to the unhinged policies of the left.