What you and
@merka are really saying just boils down to this.
1) The Pagans have used the same argument as
@LondonMo has but since what
@LondonMo is following is the truth then he's allowed to use it. You idiots have once again based your fallacious argument of the childish logic "I'm right because I'm telling the truth."
You claim my reading comprehension skills are sub-par. Well then point out where I'm wrong in my summary of the following verse.
Allah talks about how the Pagans refuse to accept Islam due to the fact that they have a greater desire to follow what they're forefathers did. Allah then (surprise surprise)
declares that what they're forefathers were doing is wrong and 'misguided.'
Now 1400 and abit years later
@LondonMo rejects
@King Wiilwaal invitation to drop this religion.
@LondonMo declares he won't as it's what his forefathers were doing.
The Pagans and
@LondonMo have essentially used the same argument; rejected a message simply because it goes contrary to what their forefathers did.
Now I'll repeat myself, do you see the irony; that
@LondonMo is using the same logic the Pagans are in rejecting something.
But of course you won't see the irony because you're on the truth and are therefore right.