Nope, somalis didn't even exist then. We were the same group/similar as the beja people and split of 5-6k years, we part of nubia not egypt. We were likely part of a nubian group that migrated south
Bantu Countries Invaded Congo to Cleanse M23 Tutsis.
- Thread starter Dalac Bilaash
- Start date
I thought at least few Somalis might fall under eygptian group since we live close to them but oh well
38 is for south somalis right? isn there a variation between northerm and southern somalia.
It's the average for most somalis, i think a few northerners get a bit higher not by much though
Nah 45% for the average but certain Somalis in the north can go up to 55%
I thought it’s 45% eursian for the average?
45 MENA 38 Eurasian, remember our mena ancestors did have ssa
I thought it was only the kenyans that had it below 38 (it was like 37.8), pretty sure the north is over 40?
Our MENA ancestors were predynastic egyptians with most of their ancestry being Eurasian some of it was SSA though
45 is middle eastern which has some african in it.
The real number is closer to 38.
I'll need to check, but if it's about MENA ancestry it's 40-45 but it's pure eurasian it's 38 on average because our ancestors were neolithic egyptians that had some ssa
Yes but some groups (like southerners) got additional eurasian over time, or some have higher indigenous hunter gatherer.
Correct, it varies a little although in general somalis are very homogeneous the differences tend to be a few percentages
What region were the somalis from somalia being tested for the lazaridis sample from?
Tutsis themselves say they migrated to the Great Lakes from the north in the 1500’s. There’s nothing wrong with being immigrants their khasaro neighbours need to learn that
there was zero energy for the white Belgium man colonizing their country but skinny nosed black people get the bullet? 
Last edited:
They probably have significant nilo saharan in them. Nilo saharans were once the largest group in the great lakes and were there before even the southern cushites migrated. The Central sudanic people and sog eastern sudanic peoples ("Sog" is another word for the Kuliak people of Northeast Uganda) were the ones previously dominating the great lakes region including Rwanda/Burundi. The word for cow in bantu languages in the great lakes comes from nilosaharan rather than cushitic.How much Nilo-Saharan ancestry do the Tutsi have? I want to know so that I can decide if I support them or not
Must be substantial, because no population in Africa (without Nilotic ancestry) is that damn tall
Attachments
Last edited:
I feel like shooting people when I see them burn vehicles or other public property. Seriously demoralizing how humans can be that retarded
It's not their land, they don't even appear on colonial maps. They migrated out of Rwanda, Burundi first in the 19th century to escape taxes and they were welcomed by the Bashi, Balega and others natives of Kivu. Then other who fled violences in Rwanda and Hutu takeover joined them but they imported their tribalism(Hutu vs Tutsi) in Congo and strated claiming the land which wasn't theirs to begin with. The fact that they were helped by Rwanda afterwards which are considered the enemy by most congolese is contradictory with their aim to be accepted as congolese. What's needed is a growing presence of congolese forces, institutions on the ground and the respect of traditional lands. As long as the congolese government doesn't control well it's eastern territories, it will go on
Latest posts
-
-
Former nba player Jeff Teague describes fight in the club with Minnesota Somalis
- Latest: Chaseyourdreamzz
-
