I felt like he watch a couple Nick Fuentes streams and tried to copy his mannerisms.I really don't understand why daniel is so bent on making his channel some 4chan-esque boys club. It's taking a really big hit on his credibility
I used to listen to Khalid Yasin back in the day, I can't believe he is 78 now, time flies.I don't listen to Blacks Sheikhs
My opinion is irrelevant on this matter but I disagree with how the brother was being in this clip. I get he doesn’t like “compassionate imams” but reading the room is key when conveying an important message.
My biggest gripe with him is that whilst having an opinion that a wife does have to cook and clean is a valid opinion since Salafi scholars and a minority of classical scholars believed that a woman should, how can he claim a Sheikh following a majority opinion with 3/4 Madhabs believing a woman doesn’t have to cook a compassionate stance?Does anyone know where DH studied and who his teachers are? He has a lot of opinions on religious matters but what are his qualifications to be speaking on these issues??
Also, you a rich nigga? 99.9% of women wouldn't want to push themselves in order to make sure they make as much as you, no they'd relax. Also, if you marry a do called independent woman, but you don't like that shit, don't come online and cry like a lil bitc& about strong independent women. Otherwise find yourself a feminine women, not a wannabe feminist.Men work outside women work inside. How hard Is this for mf to understand. People who make problems out of this and debate this shit are low iq plebs who can't think for themselves.
My biggest gripe with him is that whilst having an opinion that a wife does have to cook and clean is a valid opinion since Salafi scholars and a minority of classical scholars believed that a woman should, how can he claim a Sheikh following a majority opinion with 3/4 Madhabs believing a woman doesn’t have to cook a compassionate stance?
If a woman was to question something that most scholars believed to be true, they would be labeled a deviant? Why does he get the privilege to attack something that’s entrenched in marital fiqh and insinuate it’s feminism when it’s a view that was common as early as 1300 yrs ago?
I’m noticing a trend in modern redpill Dawah, they attack feminists for trying to change the deen whilst they will literally go after Sheikhs for reiterating stuff that’s been around for centuries.
If he was to kindly say hey, not cooking whilst your husband is out working for you and you’re at home the whole day is morally wrong, that’s understandable but that’s not even a common thing that happens and there is way to get that message across than attacking Sheikhs who are saying things that have been said in actual madhabs.
I felt like he watch a couple Nick Fuentes streams and tried to copy his mannerisms.
Feminists not only attack opinions but Actually hadiths, when they go against their solipsism.Now @Kane , this is a question I pose to you:
1. What makes DH different to feminists who attack certain aspects of classical opinions that doesn’t gel well with their sensibilities?
2. Why would DH lie and say that the Shiekh is influenced by modern views of feminism, when in fact the Sheikh’s view was in fact the majority view in the Medieval period?
I used to listen to Khalid Yasin back in the day, I can't believe he is 78 now, time flies.
I like Yasir Qadhi who seems more considerate and moderate.