I'm not here to talk about the political aspect. Siad did obviously kill a lot of issaqs. But recently watched what happned in plaestnia and lascanood has me wondering. Even the lowest estimates you often here from people talking about the isaaq genocide is 50,000 people. That came mainly from bombing the cities. But when you think about that number that's about how many people died in palestine in the first few months( it's obviously higher now) where they were subjected to massive bombing everyday and they couldn't escape Gaza. How would siad barre who obviously didn't have as many bombs been able to kill that many people ? Especially when they woukd have been able to flee right after the first couple bombs. I mean look how everybody in lascanood was gone within a few days. Yet siad barre was able to kill that many people that quickly? It doesn't make sense
This was written by CHATGPT
The legal term “genocide” refers to certain acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Genocide is an international crime, according to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948). The acts that constitute genocide fall into five categories:
Yes, the attacks by the Somali National Army (SNA) on the Isaaq population, particularly between 1987 and 1989, have widely been classified as genocide by several human rights organizations, scholars, and international observers. The events are commonly referred to as the "Isaaq Genocide," which included systematic mass killings, targeted bombings, torture, and other atrocities committed primarily against the Isaaq clan in northern Somalia (now Somaliland). Here are the key reasons why these attacks are classified as genocide:
- Killing members of the group
- Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
- Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction, in whole or in part
- Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
- Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
1. Intent to Destroy, in Whole or in Part, a Specific Group
- Genocide, as defined by the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, involves acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. Evidence suggests that the Somali government under Siad Barre systematically targeted the Isaaq clan due to their support for the Somali National Movement (SNM) and their perceived opposition to Barre's regime.
- The scale and intensity of violence directed specifically at the Isaaq population—who were labeled as "enemies" of the state—suggest an intent to punish or eradicate the group, meeting the criteria for genocide.
2. Systematic Mass Killings and Bombing Campaigns
- The SNA, alongside government-backed militias, conducted large-scale killings in Isaaq-majority cities such as Hargeisa and Burao. In 1988, government forces launched aerial bombings, artillery attacks, and other assaults on these cities, resulting in tens of thousands of civilian casualties and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Isaaq people.
- Hargeisa was almost completely destroyed, earning it the label "Africa's Hiroshima" due to the sheer devastation and loss of civilian life. The destruction of these urban centers specifically targeted areas predominantly inhabited by the Isaaq clan.
3. Use of Torture, Detention, and Execution
- The Somali government engaged in arbitrary arrests, torture, and summary executions of Isaaq people, targeting community leaders, intellectuals, and anyone suspected of having ties to the SNM or simply for being of Isaaq descent.
- Mass graves have been uncovered in Somaliland, revealing evidence of systematic execution of civilians, further supporting the classification of these actions as genocide. Human rights organizations have documented these atrocities, describing them as a deliberate attempt to dismantle Isaaq society and eliminate its members.
4. Forced Displacement and Famine
- The violence forced hundreds of thousands of Isaaq people to flee to Ethiopia and other regions, creating a humanitarian crisis. Those who remained faced severe food shortages, restricted movement, and deliberate deprivation policies that blocked aid from reaching Isaaq areas.
- The forced displacement, combined with destruction of infrastructure and agricultural resources, led to widespread starvation and suffering, part of a broader strategy to weaken the Isaaq community.
5. Ethnic Targeting and Propaganda
- The Barre regime used propaganda to label the Isaaq as "traitors" and "anti-national elements," fostering an environment of hostility that justified attacks on Isaaq civilians. This targeting of the Isaaq population based on ethnic affiliation aligns with genocidal intent, as it sought to vilify and dehumanize an entire group.
6. International Recognition and Legal Implications
- Numerous reports by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and other international organizations have characterized the atrocities committed against the Isaaq as genocide or crimes against humanity. Somaliland’s government has also made efforts to seek international recognition of these events as genocide.
- Mass grave excavations, testimonies from survivors, and documented evidence of state-planned attacks have been used to substantiate claims of genocide, even though no formal international tribunal has yet prosecuted these crimes.
7. Aftermath and Continued Recognition
In conclusion, the systematic and targeted nature of the SNA’s attacks on the Isaaq people, combined with the widespread evidence of intent to destroy the group, has led to the classification of these events as genocide. The violence inflicted upon the Isaaq community was not only intended to suppress a political insurgency but also to eradicate the Isaaq as a social and cultural entity, thereby meeting the international definition of genocide.
- The destruction and trauma experienced by the Isaaq community have had lasting effects, which contribute to the continued push for recognition of the genocide. Since the fall of Siad Barre's government, Somaliland has engaged in a process of documentation and memorialization to ensure that these atrocities are recognized as genocide.
Why are you posting chat-gpt xaar here?This was written by CHATGPT
The legal term “genocide” refers to certain acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Genocide is an international crime, according to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948). The acts that constitute genocide fall into five categories:
Yes, the attacks by the Somali National Army (SNA) on the Isaaq population, particularly between 1987 and 1989, have widely been classified as genocide by several human rights organizations, scholars, and international observers. The events are commonly referred to as the "Isaaq Genocide," which included systematic mass killings, targeted bombings, torture, and other atrocities committed primarily against the Isaaq clan in northern Somalia (now Somaliland). Here are the key reasons why these attacks are classified as genocide:
- Killing members of the group
- Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
- Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction, in whole or in part
- Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
- Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
1. Intent to Destroy, in Whole or in Part, a Specific Group
- Genocide, as defined by the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, involves acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. Evidence suggests that the Somali government under Siad Barre systematically targeted the Isaaq clan due to their support for the Somali National Movement (SNM) and their perceived opposition to Barre's regime.
- The scale and intensity of violence directed specifically at the Isaaq population—who were labeled as "enemies" of the state—suggest an intent to punish or eradicate the group, meeting the criteria for genocide.
2. Systematic Mass Killings and Bombing Campaigns
- The SNA, alongside government-backed militias, conducted large-scale killings in Isaaq-majority cities such as Hargeisa and Burao. In 1988, government forces launched aerial bombings, artillery attacks, and other assaults on these cities, resulting in tens of thousands of civilian casualties and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Isaaq people.
- Hargeisa was almost completely destroyed, earning it the label "Africa's Hiroshima" due to the sheer devastation and loss of civilian life. The destruction of these urban centers specifically targeted areas predominantly inhabited by the Isaaq clan.
3. Use of Torture, Detention, and Execution
- The Somali government engaged in arbitrary arrests, torture, and summary executions of Isaaq people, targeting community leaders, intellectuals, and anyone suspected of having ties to the SNM or simply for being of Isaaq descent.
- Mass graves have been uncovered in Somaliland, revealing evidence of systematic execution of civilians, further supporting the classification of these actions as genocide. Human rights organizations have documented these atrocities, describing them as a deliberate attempt to dismantle Isaaq society and eliminate its members.
4. Forced Displacement and Famine
- The violence forced hundreds of thousands of Isaaq people to flee to Ethiopia and other regions, creating a humanitarian crisis. Those who remained faced severe food shortages, restricted movement, and deliberate deprivation policies that blocked aid from reaching Isaaq areas.
- The forced displacement, combined with destruction of infrastructure and agricultural resources, led to widespread starvation and suffering, part of a broader strategy to weaken the Isaaq community.
5. Ethnic Targeting and Propaganda
- The Barre regime used propaganda to label the Isaaq as "traitors" and "anti-national elements," fostering an environment of hostility that justified attacks on Isaaq civilians. This targeting of the Isaaq population based on ethnic affiliation aligns with genocidal intent, as it sought to vilify and dehumanize an entire group.
6. International Recognition and Legal Implications
- Numerous reports by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and other international organizations have characterized the atrocities committed against the Isaaq as genocide or crimes against humanity. Somaliland’s government has also made efforts to seek international recognition of these events as genocide.
- Mass grave excavations, testimonies from survivors, and documented evidence of state-planned attacks have been used to substantiate claims of genocide, even though no formal international tribunal has yet prosecuted these crimes.
7. Aftermath and Continued Recognition
In conclusion, the systematic and targeted nature of the SNA’s attacks on the Isaaq people, combined with the widespread evidence of intent to destroy the group, has led to the classification of these events as genocide. The violence inflicted upon the Isaaq community was not only intended to suppress a political insurgency but also to eradicate the Isaaq as a social and cultural entity, thereby meeting the international definition of genocide.
- The destruction and trauma experienced by the Isaaq community have had lasting effects, which contribute to the continued push for recognition of the genocide. Since the fall of Siad Barre's government, Somaliland has engaged in a process of documentation and memorialization to ensure that these atrocities are recognized as genocide.
Why are you posting chat-gpt xaar here?
Doesn't really matter anyways since there is no proof that Barre had genocidal intent. His campaign in Hargeisa/Somaliland was meant to defeat SNM.
It's worse.Chat GPT relies on and is trained on wikipedia. We know wiki is xaar.
Isaaq locals and leaders were blaming SNM for turning their lives upside down.
Various witnesses who present even the one i posted moments ago blamed SNM for the situation in the North.
People back then plainly saw things for what it was, they were deranged maniacs playing with the lives of their own.
Creating a fake ''genocide'' by levaraging the civilian populations suffering to not only justify their attacks but also their secessionists aspirations
They farmed suffering to legitimize their own cause and de-legitimize the government.
It's worse.
"The Dilla and Borama massacres were among the many brutal episodes during the Somali Civil War in the late 1980s, part of a broader campaign of violence perpetrated by Siad Barre’s regime against the Isaaq population in northern Somalia. These massacres specifically targeted civilians in the towns of Dilla and Borama, which are located in the Awdal region of Somaliland. The events are often viewed as part of the systematic violence and mass killings that have been classified by human rights organizations and scholars as acts of genocide against the Isaaq people. Here’s a closer look at the massacres and their context:"
No serious researcher considers it a genocide.
It was a run of the mill suppression of a Rebellion in an African autocracy, no more and no less.
Have you noticed all things they try to pin on him and there is not a single statement he has made to prove he was all these things or any intent. Numerous letters, speeches, interviews, reports, writtings, declassified files and not a single statement.
They have a video of a group of military officers talking about eliminating SNM targets, thats about it.
Here is Siad talking about SNM and everything he mentions is backed by seperate eyewitness testimonies and third party reports, so they can't say ''Waa Siad/Kacaan propaganda '' or whatever.
Notice he doesn't refer to them as ''Isaaq'' , but calls SNM terrorists who are bringing destruction to their own. He doesn't accuse the whole isaaq population of colluding or supporting them either, but describe them as victims. He has a very rational and correct assessment of the situation.
His concern is with suffering of the people.
“𝗜𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝘄𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱𝗻’𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝘆𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 own houses, their families, their children. How is any national political aim fight to kill? begin to kill his family? So they are terrorists armed and organized by foreigners''
It wasn't even a rebellion or a supression. Rebellions are locally derived and it's locals rising up. Nothing like that actually happened.
These were literally armed foreign proxies attacking and invading a country and it's people and a national government defending itself.
They are not here to be educated. The same ones today denying the Isaaq genocide are also the same ones advocating for a new Isaaq genocide.
Caught in 4K, actually VHS.
Notice it says:You must be retarded if you think you need a direct statement to prove his knowledge and complicity in the genocide.
View attachment 346995
There are reports of the time of civilians being killed not even close to battlezones due to their background.
You would have to prove that MSB was either incapacitated or did not have chain of command and that would be hard to prove, from your side.
You people often try to hide in the gaps but really when it comes to proving things you just have to use common sense and reasonable doubt, no reasonable person would be convinced that Siad Barre was not directly involved.
Notice it says:
''While estimates of number of casualties are impossible to estimate''
I actually read the Gersony report
You are denying a genocide even took place, so we got you on one count of lying. The numbers are debatable.
No it wasn't locally derived or based even.SNM were a local group, not a foreign group, so they can't be a foreign proxy (a proxy for a time but not a foreign one because theres no such thing a foreign proxy, the word is proxy only, you just added foreign to make it seem a purely Ethiopian project.
They received some support from Ethiopia but they were sent out of Ethiopia after a deal between MSB and Mengitsu, most of their support came from Isaaq. That's when most of the fighting occured.
Why do you think the Isaaq Elders in the North said that the SNM was ''Plunging the north into desolation and chaos while they themselves were living comfortably abroad''
It because they were based in England and Ethiopia were they organized themselves and first popped up.
The SNM were seperate from the local Isaaq leadership until 1989 and the guurti system was created in Ethiopia through merging both, but later they just outsted the the local issaq elders and replaced them with stooges.
It was the insurgent SNM attacking people, refuge camps and embedding themselves within the civilian population in major cities at the same time.
As the report said the civilian deaths and casualties resulted from that. It's a lie to frame it differently.
No it wasn't locally derived or based even.
SNM has roots that that ties back to the Ethiopian regime of 1961 after failed secessionist coup attempt sponsored by Haile Selassie.
But SNM was formally founded in a pub in London by an Alcoholic Christian named Dr. Omar Elmi Dihoud after the Ogaden war in 1978.
Then they became split between the London group and the Saudi based group who were traditionalists. The London group took over, removed the Suadi group and became the most influential, they were alcoholic liberal and secularists with Christians in their ranks.
Notice none of this is taking place in the local communities of Northern Somalia.
Then they contacted Ethiopian Embassy in London and plotted a relocation to Ethiopia, to finalize and to organized themselves.
14 leading SNM were invited by Mengistu's Colonel Moges and housed by Ethiopia funded and armed to kick start their insurgencies, and carry out the plan of secession coined by the Ethiopian general.
Col. Moges was pretty much organizing everything, replacing certain SSDF and SNM leaders replacing them with someone else, putting them together etc.
Why do you think the Isaaq Elders in the North said that the SNM was ''Plunging the north into desolation and chaos while they themselves were living comfortably abroad''
It because they were based in England and Ethiopia were they organized themselves and first popped up.
The SNM were seperate from the local Isaaq leadership until 1989 and the guurti system was created in Ethiopia through merging both, but later they just outsted the the local issaq elders and replaced them with stooges.
You realize that the word genocide actually means something right? It's funny that this whole narrative really began with that bbc documentary on YouTube in the late 2000s . None of the other genocides had a militia that was literally fighting with mikitary and finacial support from a foreign government as well as commenting massacre of local people.Lol, that all gave me a good laugh.
How does any of this disprove the reported facts that the SNA was killing isaaq away from battle zones? Were they all embedded SNM? If so using your basis is there any way to prove a genocide took place. If any person Isaaq person could be an SNM member they can be killed, armed or unarmed in any place any time. There's no way for you to commit a genocide using this framework. You essentially disprove genocide by making it impossible to even commit, thankfully the real world doesn't operate like that.
You just became an honorary Israeli.
I gave you reported facts.Lol, that all gave me a good laugh.
How does any of this disprove the reported facts that the SNA was killing isaaq away from battle zones? Were they all embedded SNM? If so using your basis is there any way to prove a genocide took place. If any person Isaaq person could be an SNM member they can be killed, armed or unarmed in any place any time. There's no way for you to commit a genocide using this framework. You essentially disprove genocide by making it impossible to even commit, thankfully the real world doesn't operate like that.
You just became an honorary Israeli.