Sahih the highest authority in Islam? Forgot about quran bro?Agree to disagree? I'm sorry but that's not how Islam works. It isn't a matter of opinion. My source was islamqa, as it is a highly regarded and reputable source. How about Mary Jo though? And I only said that once if I remember correctly. (I don't think you'll accuse me of not caring enough or respecting myself if I don't though. What spam? I'm just laying here the cold facts. It's up to you to take it or leave it. And the sources I listed out were the ones you cited, all three of them. If you don't believe them then the default is Saheeh Bukhari, the widely-accepted and highly-regarded highest authority on all hadith. And if that wasn't the best source (and it wasn't) then what source better than Saheeh Bukhari do you have? If you have four people, one is unknown, the other is likely biased, and another is probably lying - but the fourth is known to be truthful and well-known, who will you believe? Also keep in mind those were the only three citations you provided. If you truly respect Sahih Bukhari, then I'd expect you to believe it. If you don't believe it then don't claim to respect it. And what exactly do you mean by the 'little messed up stuff in Bukhari'? I can also make vague, broad statements without evidence to 'prove a point'. And, "so you always have to be careful". I wouldn't call placing my trust in New Mexico and Mary Jo very careful, these two could very well have an agenda - and likely do. Saheeh Bukhari on the other hand is the highest authority in Islam. So whose the illogical one here? The one who entrusts in such people? Or the one who believes Sahih Bukhari?
again, search up IslamQa and it’s reputation as a salafi source lmao
If those nations led by women were doomed, explain the story of Queen Sheba and her nation. She was mentioned in quran and has an entire Surah after her.
I’m pretty sure you’re looking at the actual author of the sources and not the actual content in them which is kind of sad, if we’re playing that game though Bukhara was 16 When he began collecting Hadith and he’s not infallible like a Prophet or something. Bound to make mistakes in quotation, and there’s quite a few contradictions within that book of Hadith. Book 8 Hadith 3427 is an example of some rubbish in Sahih Bukhari, you’ve got book 4 hadith 159/160 contrasting each other... the list goes on.
Judge on content and not writer kk