I want to hear your thoughts on what you'd prefer the most.
implementing the law of God to its fullest extent, with the most qualified individuals in charge across every field, whether it's education, law, foreign relations, import/export, infrastructure development, or anything else essential for national progress, where there would be no favoritism, no corruption, no extremists in government, and no one above the law. Or do you prefer the current situation, where each region governs itself under God's law, but not fully?
They argue that such a move would set the country back by millennia, leading to extreme stagnation and risking blacklisting from the global trading system, which is monopolized by the wealthiest nations.
This explains why many non-Western countries emphasize their commitment to democratic values, often highlighting their adherence to democratic principles as a strategy to appease these wealthier nations. These powerful countries control significant investments and major development projects that are vital for the growth of developing nations. By aligning with these global powers, non-Western countries secure international benefits, such as financial aid and market access, which are contingent on their global standing. However, countries with weaker economies often receive minimal support, support that is frequently conditional and influenced by decisions that may benefit other nations rather than their own. These countries are effectively controlled by the small amount of support they receive and are always reminded of who is keeping them in charge.
Their political systems are often built on the premise of doing whatever it takes to please those who provide aid, aiming to avoid a harsher life while simultaneously entering into dubious long-term deals that could leave them in debt for centuries.
Funny how people with such mindsets always come to power, they often say that failure to please the wealthy nations controlling market access will jeopardize the country's success. Thus, they avoid fully implementing law of Allah due to the losses that come with it, which outweigh the benefits crucial to their economic and political stability. This cautious approach stems from the fear of severe economic sanctions and widespread poverty, though such outcomes are not guaranteed.
They’d prefer to maintain the current system and be good, well-behaved stooges who toe the line and do as they are told, just like everyone else. When I think about how the world is set up at the moment, it reminds me of this quote from Umar Ibn Al Khattab: “We were the most humiliated people on earth and God gave us honour through Islam. If we ever seek honour through anything else, God will humiliate us again.”.
implementing the law of God to its fullest extent, with the most qualified individuals in charge across every field, whether it's education, law, foreign relations, import/export, infrastructure development, or anything else essential for national progress, where there would be no favoritism, no corruption, no extremists in government, and no one above the law. Or do you prefer the current situation, where each region governs itself under God's law, but not fully?
They argue that such a move would set the country back by millennia, leading to extreme stagnation and risking blacklisting from the global trading system, which is monopolized by the wealthiest nations.
This explains why many non-Western countries emphasize their commitment to democratic values, often highlighting their adherence to democratic principles as a strategy to appease these wealthier nations. These powerful countries control significant investments and major development projects that are vital for the growth of developing nations. By aligning with these global powers, non-Western countries secure international benefits, such as financial aid and market access, which are contingent on their global standing. However, countries with weaker economies often receive minimal support, support that is frequently conditional and influenced by decisions that may benefit other nations rather than their own. These countries are effectively controlled by the small amount of support they receive and are always reminded of who is keeping them in charge.
Their political systems are often built on the premise of doing whatever it takes to please those who provide aid, aiming to avoid a harsher life while simultaneously entering into dubious long-term deals that could leave them in debt for centuries.
Funny how people with such mindsets always come to power, they often say that failure to please the wealthy nations controlling market access will jeopardize the country's success. Thus, they avoid fully implementing law of Allah due to the losses that come with it, which outweigh the benefits crucial to their economic and political stability. This cautious approach stems from the fear of severe economic sanctions and widespread poverty, though such outcomes are not guaranteed.
They’d prefer to maintain the current system and be good, well-behaved stooges who toe the line and do as they are told, just like everyone else. When I think about how the world is set up at the moment, it reminds me of this quote from Umar Ibn Al Khattab: “We were the most humiliated people on earth and God gave us honour through Islam. If we ever seek honour through anything else, God will humiliate us again.”.
