Zo206
Zoobandz aka Leech (Yungin in Charge)
oh so u is claimin AA now?damn, we f*cked
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
oh so u is claimin AA now?damn, we f*cked
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Coping aside
when affirmative action was banned in California the proportion of Black students dramatically fell, by 43% at UCLA and 66% at UC Berkeley.
Acceptance of Blacks, Latinos to UC Plunges
Education: In first freshman class since affirmative action was ended, Berkeley and UCLA see dramatic drop-offs. Campuses will now launch campaigns to persuade students to attend.www.latimes.com
You haven't provided an alternative reference to show immediate demographic impact following race-based affirmative action ban.1. Your source is from 1998 and there have been concessions made since then. It is an outdated source.
I don't understand your point. You mentioned earlier how universities have developed alternative strategies as a sort of loop hole to the banning of race-based affirmative action (you mentioned neighborhood). You don't think the probing of (socio-economic) info on: family income, parental education level, and neighborhood characteristics; in addition to the 'holistic approach' that deemphasizes test scores and GPA, instead focuses on personal circumstances, extracurricular activities, and community involvement, played a role in the bounce back of black matriculation? My point was the banning of race-based affirmative action will have an impact, as its one less strategy for universities to address the achievement gap between different racial groups. Therefore decreasing opportunities to historically destitute groups, perpetuating existing disparities and hindering efforts to address institutional inequities.2. Here is an updated source from Reuters.
“According to the latest census data, the state's population is 6.5% Black, 40% Hispanic, 35% white, 16% Asian and 1.7% Native American.”
“Black student enrollment across the system - which hovered at 3 or 4% for decades after the affirmative action ban - last year rose to 5%.”
“Last fall, Black students made up 7% of UCLA's freshman class, the same as before affirmative action was banned.”
3. Here is another source that illustrates how black and hispanic admissions rose when standardized test scores were banned in 2020. This will definitely be the future for the rest of the nation. They will attempt to equalize the playing field with or without AA.
“UC over the years has also ramped up its outreach to low-income students and students enrolled at underserved high schools.”
“Without being able to consider race in admissions, universities will be forced to “work much harder to identify and address the root causes of societal inequities that hinder diverse students in pursuing and achieving a higher education,” said Michael Drake, UC’s systemwide president, in a statement Thursday.”
“But the university maintains that holistic review, introduced in 2001, has allowed the system to make some gains. In the two decades from fall 2002 to fall 2022, the percentage of undergraduate Latino students enrolled across UC has increased from 13% to 25%, though some of that is likely also due to demographic changes in the state, as Latinos now make up a larger share of high school seniors. The share of Black students has also increased from 3% to 4.4%, while the percentage of white students has decreased from 36.5% to 20.7%. White students made up 21.2% of high school seniors last year and Black students accounted for 4.9%.”
“UC [system] in 2020 also eliminated standardized test scores from admissions. That was followed by a big increase in applications to the university, including among Black and Latino students. Experts attributed that partly to the elimination of those tests, saying students likely felt more optimistic about their chances of being admitted.”
4. It sounds like you’re not American and you don’t understand how our systems work.
Our universities are trying to meet racial quotas. They won’t stop trying to meet those racial quotas even though AA is banned. And where was I mistaken about the legacy admissions? It’s not a secret. Legacy students make up between 25% to 35% of the student body at certain universities. American universities heavily rely on private donations for funding. They receive millions of dollars from donors.
You haven't provided an alternative reference to show immediate demographic impact following race-based affirmative action ban.
I don't understand your point. You mentioned earlier how universities have developed alternative strategies as a sort of loop hole to the banning of race-based affirmative action (you mentioned neighborhood). You don't think the probing of (socio-economic) info on: family income, parental education level, and neighborhood characteristics; in addition to the 'holistic approach' that deemphasizes test scores and GPA, instead focuses on personal circumstances, extracurricular activities, and community involvement, played a role in the bounce back of black matriculation?
My point was the banning of race-based affirmative action will have an impact,
as its one less strategy for universities to address the achievement gap between different racial groups. Therefore decreasing opportunities to historically destitute groups, perpetuating existing disparities and hindering efforts to address institutional inequities.
You claimed the source was obsolete without a recent contemporary reference we can use in place. What kind of dumb logic is that?Why should I? I never argued that the banning of AA and meritocracy didn’t have an impact on demographic changes to begin with.
You're all over the place. No, that's exactly what you rebuked. In addition to saying blacks weren't taking Asian's spots. Despite the data showing the Asian proportion of the student body shot up with the ban of affirmative action and the Asian% again fell with the adoption of alternative strategies designed to circumvent bans of race-based affirmative action.I never disagreed with that? I know that there will be demographic changes following the ban, as we witnessed in California.
they’re still going to circumvent around the ban and covertly consider race based admissions.
That’s what I meant by “nothing will change.”
You claimed the source was obsolete without a recent contemporary reference we can use in place. What kind of dumb logic is that?
You're all over the place. No, that's exactly what you rebuked. In addition to saying blacks weren't taking Asian's spots.
Despite the data showing the Asian proportion of the student body shot up with the ban of affirmative action and the Asian% again fell with the adoption of alternative strategies designed to circumvent bans of race-based affirmative action.
Case in point:
No more Somalis claiming to be Madow to get into Top Ivy League schools
mashallah that’s good i hope more somali kids will be enrolling in the states. i know in MN a lot of younger kids are getting into high demand fields or keen to in HS.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
no worries i deleted my replyPlease edit out and delete what you quoted because I will be having this doxxable info deleted. Thank you.
If you’re smart and ambitious, there is nothing you can’t do in this country and I will die on this hill.
Congratulations to your cousin. That UC is the #1 public university in the nation. That’s no easy feat.
Exactly, these 4chan wannabes will not say a thing about legacy admission but make fun of AA for this SC decision.
Legacy admissions weren’t affected
oh so u is claimin AA now?
I don’t believe it will effect Somalis.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Exactly, these 4chan wannabes will not say a thing about legacy admission but make fun of AA for this SC decision.
All the chosen black student who got into ivy uni are competent and well achievers. There will be over achiever more than be available seats, so this act, assures that, also black students with the required scores, get into the prestigious uni to have a better life. The name of the uni matters. And this is not benefit the black students only, but extend to other minorities.Social advocacy to rebuild the fractured black family unit and then promotion of a studious culture within the black home to see SAT scores on par with asians across the board.
Treating blacks as intellectually incapable through affirmative action is extremely demeaning and implicitly racist and any self-respecting black, like Clarence Thomas, would rightfully reject it on a fundamental basis as it is a contractual agreement where you waive your right to be seen as a genuine equal - contrary to racialist narratives, being black is not an impediment!
Having a functional multiracial society means we give every group a stake in it. For variegated reasons, some groups don’t perform as well as others in measures of academic attainment, despite exhaustive attempts to correct this. China/India/Malaysia has affirmitive action too
Some degree of racial preference is necessary to avoid groups being permanently locked out of the system, and succumbing to stagnancy and despair at best, or revolutionarism at worst. Racial preferences are a way for an otherwise meritocratic ruling class to retain some degree of legitimacy. Without them, meritocracy would collapse. This is a disaster
What percentage of american somalis go to uni and what type of unis do they typically attend?