Too much Coke killed their brain cells
If you agree Somalis enslaved each other, what is so difficult in accepting they would sell them off to other groups?
Your contention assumes that males were allowed to produce offspring, which was generally not the case in the Arab slavetrade. The paternal haplotypes would have died off. That, of course, takes the notion that there is a genetic construct for what is a Somali, and the jury is still out on that one.
Lies. Our Boqor may Allah swt have mercy on him, freed the Bantus, gave them jobs and lands. They're all appreciative to him and hail him as their hero.
This is actually wrong. I believe @Thegoodshepherd did an interesting topic on this of a thriving puntite community in Southern Arabia alongside their mehri brethren. Why don't they show up in your nobel-prize winning studies?
The notion that there has not been any sort of genetic exchange between the two regions is not only laughable but completely unrealistic from a scientific standpoint.
That is all besides the point. All it takes is just one slave from one of the clans being sold in the Arabian peninsula to shatter your narrative. It is an extraordinary claim that Somalis from completely different tribes would not sell Somalis from other tribes to Arabs, while having no qualms selling habeshis and others. A claim that requires extraordinary evidence.
We only enslaved you(Bantus), xabeshas and oromos. Ethnic Somalis could not be enslaved according to xeer law. Also all of the groups named before were NOT muslim.This is actually wrong. I believe @Thegoodshepherd did an interesting topic on this of a thriving puntite community in Southern Arabia alongside their mehri brethren. Why don't they show up in your nobel-prize winning studies?
The notion that there has not been any sort of genetic exchange between the two regions is not only laughable but completely unrealistic from a scientific standpoint.
That is all besides the point. All it takes is just one slave from one of the clans being sold in the Arabian peninsula to shatter your narrative. It is an extraordinary claim that Somalis from completely different tribes would not sell Somalis from other tribes to Arabs, while having no qualms selling habeshis and others. A claim that requires extraordinary evidence.
This is what a Somali couple on yt is claiming. I've seen throughout different social medias Somalis running with the same narrative...they want a history of enslavement so bad it's ridiculous. What's up with that?
Finally, the historians of SSpot should way in on this. Were Somalis enslaved? discuss!
https://books.google.ca/books?id=hv6244EfR_MC&pg=PA6&dq=somalia+did+not+supply+slaves&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiZ3-jFhc_QAhXJ5oMKHfrZC64Q6AEIJTAC#v=onepage&q=somalia did not supply slaves&f=falseSomalia did not supply slaves -- as part of the Islamic world Somalis were at least nominally protected by the religious tenet that free Muslims cannot be enslaved.
https://books.google.ca/books?id=LR8A4tEYZUAC&q=enslaved#v=snippet&q=enslaved&f=false"Muuse Galaal (Somali poet, historian, sheekh, teacher, UNESCO representative for the Ministry of Education, and presently a member of the Somali Language Commission)[...] notes, where Arabs do miscegenate, it is with peoples they have enslaved. The Somalis, being warlike, and close racially to the Arabs, have never been enslaved by them. So although the Arab peninsula was the foundation of the religion of the Somali people, the degree of Arab cultural influence has been rather small."
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2717375?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents"In December 1839, small additions to the Moresby Treaty were agreed upon by Said. One addition shifted the line marking the limits of the "internal" Omani slave trade slightly westward so as to insulate the British "protected" states in India from the virus of the Arab slave trade. Another clause was designed to protect the "caucasoid" Somalis from enslavement. Said agreed that the Somalis, being "free men," i.e. Muslims, were not to be carried away from Africa as slaves.14 By implication, non-Muslims were suitable objects of enslavement."
https://books.google.ca/books?id=DPwOsOcNy5YC&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=omani empire&f=falseThe dynasty reached its apex under the successive reigns of Sultan Yusuf Mahamud Ibrahim, who successfully consolidated Geledi power during the Bardera wars in 1843, and Sultan Ahmed Yusuf, who forced regional powers such as the Omani Empire to submit tribute.
Somalis probably enslaved other Somalis on an individual basis.
R.Pankhurst comprehensive article on on trade in these ports, the author is careful to add on p.42 . The Somalis did not enslave their own people; this is discussed subsequently in the main text.
https://books.google.ca/books?id=22...hinvolume&q=+did+not+enslave+their+own+peopleArabs trading up and down the Indian ocean coast had no justification in taking any Somalis nor could the Muslim Somalis North or South, enslave eachother.
"we assume that we were probably enslaved, we're not sure because where does the superiority complex in East Africa come from?" She's so dumb which makes her that much cuter. lol bless them
''Somalis think they are superior because think they were never enslaved and think its an achievement''
Apart from the Arab slave trade, enslaving Somalis during the Atlantic slave trade was just not possible or inconvienient due to its location.
Ajuran's Somali forces would eventually militarily defeat the Portuguese. The Ottoman Empire would also remain an economic partner of the Somalis.[6] Throughout the 16th and 17th centuries successive Somali Sultans defied the Portuguese economic monopoly in the Indian Ocean by employing a new coinage which followed the Ottoman pattern, thus proclaiming an attitude of economic independence in regard to the Portuguese.
There Gama was tortured in an attempt to force him to convert to Islam. Castanhoso's -- and Jerónimo Lobo's account after him—describe Gama's fortitude and death in language worthy of a hagiography, complete with miracles.[22] In the end Ahmad Gurey chopped off Gama's head and tossed it into a nearby spring, whose waters Castanhoso reported gained a reputation for giving "health to the sick"]
that makes zero sense. just because they live there (which makes sense because of the proximity and cultural exchange between somalis and the arabian peninsula) doesn't mean they went their as slaves. there is ZERO historical significance of this sis. try again.
We only enslaved you(Bantus), xabeshas and oromos. Ethnic Somalis could not be enslaved according to xeer law. Also all of the groups named before were NOT muslim.
You misunderstand the argument. Your buddy is claiming there is essentially zero genetic exchange between the two neighboring populations, which any anthropologist worth their weight would laugh at outright. One way this is done is through slavery, but there are many other conventional ways that do not involve slavery. This heavily puts the 'data' he keeps citing heavily in doubt. It's only common sense to expect some kind of genetic presence of certain Somali haplotypes in the Arabian peninsula, the Puntite communities I mentioned earlier being a very blaring example, and does not necessarily mean they are artifacts of slavery.
Even your Somali fanatical purists @Amun and @Bahal don't deny it. Entire sub-clans have enslaved others sub-clans in their wars. I don't want this to be moved to the clan topic so you can do your own research on this matter.
There is no shame in being enslaved sxb. Even Europeans enslaved each other. Some of the most powerful nations and ethnic groups today were slaves at some point in their history to groups of people who today have nothing. Just accept the facts and move on.
R.Pankhurst comprehensive article on on trade in these ports, the author is careful to add on p.42 . The Somalis did not enslave their own people; this is discussed subsequently in the main text.
https://books.google.ca/books?id=22...hinvolume&q=+did+not+enslave+their+own+peopleArabs trading up and down the Indian ocean coast had no justification in taking any Somalis nor could the Muslim Somalis North or South, enslave eachother.
The Somali pastorals, which we are studying here, have, for example, developed rules of war of astonishing modernity. These rules identify certain groups of the population called "Birmageydo" who are spared and protected in the event of war. This category includes women, children, the elderly but also the Sages, men of science and religion, the hosts and all those who are foreign to the conflict. The dignity and certain rights of the wounded and prisoners of war are also defended in this "Geneva Convention" before the hour.