Yh no, you misconstrued my argument, you cannot put boundaries or logic on love,The multiple kids argument is a false and incomparable one as you cannot compare the love a parent has for their child, with the love a woman/man has for a spouse. One is unconditional and another is based on conditions and sometimes many conditions. Love between men and women is one that wanes and increases and sometimes people ‘fall out of love’. It’s unreliable, but parental love is the most reliable one of all. A mother would sacrifice her life for ALL of her children, yet a woman cannot guarantee that her husband will still want to stay with her if she has a cancer diagnosis or instead of using that time to support her, he might use it to acquire a new wife whilst he pushes her back to her parents house to care for her. The same can also be said about a man who loses all of his wealth.
If a parent has the capability to love MULTIPLE children then clearly the human being is designed to be able to love multiple things, what you are doing is projecting your own idea of love onto the relationship, you have already put your own mental barriers of what you would love
their is no logical reason why a man can't love 2 women, it is purely based on subjective experience. Which is my point
Also when a mans wife gets ill, and he leaves for another women he clearly does not love her in the beginning, if a man truly loved his wife he would do anything for her, men have started wars and died for women, I don't think it is impossible for a man to care for his wife,these men let their evil side get the better of them and are not good men and didn't sincerely love their wives 99% of the time
Women who leave a man because he loses all his money is the same, I think most women will always be patient with a man who loses all his money as long as he has the work ethic to try and earn it back, women are loyal usually and patient with their husband if they have good morals and also love their husband